Skip to content

Sleeping Pad

Thermarest Prolite Plus Regular
Thermarest Prolite Plus Regular

Sleeping pad

When Three Points of the Compass first began camping as an individual, it was only for brief forays from the bosom of my family while still a quite innocent and naive young man. More an impecunious teenage making do with what gear I could save for with the meagre earnings from a paper round, or what was languishing in the loft from (presumably) my dad’s younger days supplemented by what I could scrounge.

Brief cycle trips into the neighbouring countryside were followed by the occasional overnight when an Army Cadet. A bright blue and almost shapeless climbing sack was, on occasion, stuffed full of the assorted gear that I could muster and I extended my experience into overnight bivvies in the local woods. There was little beyond this that surburban Hertfordshire could offer, but still a thrill to a nervous lad stretching at boundaries. My earliest ground cover was basic. It was simply a grey woollen blanket that my mother permitted me to cut into a tapered shape in a vain attempt to save on bulk and weight. She taught me blanket stitch and the rough edges, cut diagonally across the weft were tidied up with bright red wool. I even sewed a handful of cub scout badges that I had somehow earned onto the top edge to make it more presentable, God, what was I thinking!

This early attempt at insulation beneath me while camping was soon superseded by the lightest blow up mattress I could find, the sort of thing that was sold cheaply in beach side shops and intended to last a week on the sand and local swimming pool. It was bright pink and required blowing up hard otherwise my hip rested on the ground (I have always been a side sleeper). So hard was the mattress that it was uncomfortable enough to prevent sleep. Thereby providing all the more time to consider just how useless it was. When it developed too many leaks to continue patching with a cycle tyre repair kit it was thrown away with little regret. Fortunately there was an efficient alternative available from the local Woolworths that was cheap enough to even be within reach of my limited funds.

Karrimat

Derrick Booth-The Backpackers Hand Book
Derrick Booth-‘The Backpackers Hand Book’. Note rolled closed cell sleeping pad.

Possibly the first book I ever purchased that helped guide me in my early purchases of camping equipment was Derrick Booth’s The Backpacker’s Hand Book. I read the book from cover to cover and still today believe it contains much good sense and advice, if now a victim of it’s time. Re-visiting my youth I tracked down a copy, unfortunately I could not find a hard back like the one I read so avidly in the ’70’s, instead I now have the paperback 1982 third edition reprint.

It was Booth who put me on to the option of a closed cell mat. Before I purchased a Karrimat I had experimented with a thin piece of cheap foam purchased from the local haberdashers. I failed to understand the difference between open and closed cell foam and, needless to say, the open cell foam compressed completely, provided zero insulation and was just as useless as the air mattress had been except even less comfortable.

My Karrimat, made by Karrimor, was a roll of bright yellow, half inch thick, closed cell foam pad. It was probably the only piece of kit that I purchased in the 1970’s that could still hold its head up against today’s opposition. Never the most comfortable piece of padding, nonetheless it insulated reasonably well from the cold ground. It was incredibly lightweight and when rolled up, its bulk could be strapped to the outside of the bright orange external frame pack that I proudly possessed at the time.

When I made my first attempt at any sort of ‘long distance’ hiking; a self-devised 80 mile circumnavigation of the Isle of Wight in the late 1970’s, this is what I used. So suitable was it that when I repeated the hike, in under 40 hours, the following decade, this is what I took for my brief overnight halt. I used the Karrimat right through the 1980’s and it was only in the 1990’s that I decided to cut it up to make pot cosies.

Later, as a young man and still later, as a young soldier, I was rough enough, tough enough and probably stupid enough to make do with very little in the way of underbody insulation when camping. If I didn’t have a closed cell mat, then I frequently made do with pulling together natural insulation- bracken, pine needles etc. These together with excess clothing kept beneath an army ‘maggot’- a down and feather sleeping bag with waterproof base, usually sufficed. Nights were seldom comfortable, or warm for that matter, thankfully I shall never return to that situation if I can help it.

Foam pads are still a viable option for those looking to save a good deal of money, or boost the insulative qualities of an existing mat (either foam or inflatable) while also giving a little puncture protection to a second fragile and expensive inflatable mat. There is a large range of foam pads available from various manufacturers and some have some quite ingenious design features incorporated to boost insulation or comfort without necessarily increasing the bulk of an already large product, or increasing weight. Almost all of these are based around either Evazote or Plasazote foams and Three Points of the Compass had a closer look at these foams here. It is also possible to buy these two foams (choose Evazote) direct from a supplier relatively cheaply and cut and shape your own.

Thermarest Prolite

Looking to an improvement to my closed cell foam mat, it wasn’t difficult to settle on a far more comfortable and more efficient alternative. While there were cheaper rivals, by far the biggest market leader was Thermarest. The mat I chose was a full length (51cm x 183cm), 3.8cm thick Thermarest Prolite 4 from their, somewhat ambitiously named, ‘Fast & Light’ range. It had a bright orange top side and a grey base. Size Regular, it weighed 680g.

Somewhat optimistically advertised by Thermarest as a four season mat, the Prolite mat provided an R-value of 3.2. Wow!

OK, it was time to learn a little about the deep dark and secretive world of R-values. R-value is a measure of thermal resistance. Simply put, it is the ratio of the temperature difference above and below the mat and the heat transfer between these points over time. A higher R-value indicates that a mat resists heat transfer better than a mat with a lower R-value. Mats would typically have a range of between 1 and 8. So at 3.2 the Prolite was OK, but not exactly great.

There are a number of features that put this mat above the foam mat in my mind. Comfort is a big factor, these old bones appreciate the vast improvement however as a side sleeper, the hip can still bottom out if the mat is a tad soft.

In April 2011 a fault in the earlier Prolites manifested itself. Camping in the Peak District I went out exploring the hills, returning to my tent in the afternoon I was greeted by a mat that looked as though it had been gorging itself.

While almost self inflating once unrolled, the Thermarest mats require a few final puffs of air to finish them off before closing off the valve. Over time the moist breath builds up condensation inside the mat, you could actually see mould growth within the mat through the thin walls. This was no doubt unkind to the internal fabric, probably rotting the baffles inside. On a warm day and subsequent expanding air, the two sides can separate with disastrous consequence. A slight bubble quickly becomes larger and the mat becomes impossible to sleep on.

Top side of Thermarest mat, impossible to sleep on once sides separate. Peak District, 2011
Top side of Thermarest mat, impossible to sleep on once sides separate. Peak District, 2011
Base of 'exploded' Thermarest Prolite 4. Peak District, 2011
Base of ‘exploded’ Thermarest Prolite 4. Peak District, 2011

I emailed pictures off to the distributor for Thermarest and was promptly sent a replacement mat; quite excellent customer service. By then, I had purchased a replacement myself as I was ‘in the field’, as it were. As a result I still have the replacement in its wrapping unused. (edit- my daughter has since happily sold this via eBay)

Thermarest Prolite Plus mat. R-Value of 3.8
Thermarest Prolite Plus mat. R-Value of 3.8

The replacement mat was the improved version. This was the Thermarest Prolite Plus. The same size: 51cm  x 183cm (20″ x 72″). This mat also weighs 680g (24oz) and offers an R-Value of 3.8, a slight improvement on my earlier mat. I have used this down to -5°C (23° F), unsurprisingly at that temperature the cold is seeping through the mat, especially at the hip (or more accurately, my body is attempting to heat up the planet). The lesson has been learnt though, and if I leave the mat in the tent during the day, the valve is tweaked open to allow for expansion should the day warm up. No more exploded mats please.

Replacement mat, that good that I haven't sold it on
Replacement mat, that good that I haven’t sold it on

This mat continued to give good service. It is a tough mat, lasts a long time and is very resistanct to punctures. It is a tad heavy for backpacking however and a lot has appeared on the market to rival these mats.

It wasn’t a difficult decision to make the change to one of the thicker and lighter inflatable mats. There a great number of manufacturers but Three Points of the Compass stuck with Thermarest. Call it blind brand loyalty if you will. However the first mat that I moved onto was intended for winter backpacking and the product with the most insulative qualities was coincidentally made by Thermarest.

Thermarest NeoAir

The Thermarest NeoAir XTherm has now been around for quite a few years. At the time I went looking at them for the first time, depending on the size I purchased, these ranged from 430g to 640g. All were 6.3 cm (2.5″) thick and had an R-Value of 5.7. My size Large weighed 580g. I favoured the X-Therm over the lighter NeoAir XLite due to its increased efficiency and apparent greater durability. There remained the question of how to inflate it. Do I go with simply blowing it up, with the inherent risk of condensation inside, which can freeze into ice crystals at night with subsequent risk of puncture. There is a chance, though not as many think, of mould growing on the inside of the mat over time. Or I could use the inflator bag (snozzle) that came with the mat, or one of the little battery powered inflators.

I purchased a Thermarest NeoAir XTherm and used it extensively in advance of my 2018 hike across the length of the UK. This is a tough fabric mat with 30D rip HT Nylon fabric on top and 70D Nylon on the underside. I still regard it as a terrific mat despite it developing a slight leak part way through my hike that I never managed to track down, despite a number of times immersing it in a bath of water. I am pretty sure it was actually the valve as sometimes it remained inflated. Other nights I woke feeling the cold of the ground below me and would have to roll to one side, put a couple of puffs back into the mat, then roll back on to it and back into slumber mode.

Following my hike I retired it and purchased another. Some may feel that I should have returned it to Thermarest under protest and demanded a replacement, I would argure that I bought a product, used it hard, and it wore out under fair wear and tear.

Large size Thermarest NeoAir XTherm (left) and XLite (right)
Large size Thermarest NeoAir XTherm (left) and XLite (right)

Soon after I also purchased one of the Thermarest NeoAir XLite inflatable mattresses. Purely because I wanted to drop a few grams in carried weight and do not require winter pad in the summer. The R-value is reduced, now 4.2, which is still respectable and effective. Part of the weight loss is down to lighter, slightly less durable materials in part of it’s construction- 30D rip HT Nylon both top and bottom. The XLite came in at 445g. Both XLite and XTherm were Large size as I like a full mat to kip on. Both mats measured 64cm x 196cm x 6.3cm. The XLite I purchased in 2020 has their new ‘Winglock’ valve, which will hopefully prevent the deflation problem of yore.

2020 Xlite with Winglock valve
2020 Thermarest NeoAir Xlite with Winglock valve
2019 Thermarest NeoAir XTherm
2019 Thermarest NeoAir XTherm with ‘Classic’ valve

The bane of many backpackers is the blowing up of an inflatable mattress each day. That is one of the great advantages of the self-inflating Prolite range, where internal memory foam assists in them gaining some shape, just requiring a few last puffs to top off and firm them up. However pads like the Thermarest XLite and XTherm require blowing up. There are just a two or three options. Blow up by mouth, or use a ‘snozzle’ bag. These usually come supplied with the mat but some DIY/MYOG efforts can produce lighter options. For those prepared to pack along a little extra weight there are small electric pumps. Thermarest make their own, those use replaceable and disposable batteries. Three Points of the Compass prefers slightly less of an environmental impact and is more a fan of the rechargeable alternatives. One of the smallest and best is the FLEXTAILGEAR Tiny Pump which I looked at here..

4 replies »

  1. Holy Cow! I’m not the only one suffering this failure.

    Bought my first ThermaRest self-inflating mattress in 1990 and it lasted until 2017 without a fault. Then I replaced it with the ThermaRest Basecamp XL 2199714 as it was larger. 10 months later (2018) it blew up, like your orange one, after a few days of internal ‘crackling’ sound. Posted picture of ‘gorged snake’ on Twitter and was told by Cascade (parent company) it was an “ANOMALY” and it was replaced after inspection by company. Was NOT told breath moisture may have caused failure.

    At 04:30 on April 9, 2019 replacement BaseCamp XL literally popped with a huge bang (like a tire blow out) and no advance crackling or bulging notice. That’s when I Googled and found your post and images.

    Obviously my ThermaRest EPIC FAIL is not ‘an ANOMALY’. This is a Manufacturing fault! That has a relatively simple possible solution, which I am proposing to company (and I want recognition for this)!

    Like

    • Hi Terrence, I agree that Thermarest do seem to have had a problem for years with the layers separating. I will say that their customer service following a complaint is excellent. Not that such a thing is of any use if actually on trail when a mat goes. It is some years since this problem has manifested itself for me as I changed to the Thermarest Xtherm some years ago when I changed to using a quilt rather than a bag. That has proved faultless for me apart from a slow leak, that could have occurred with any inflatable mat

      Like

  2. Ah, the joys of google. Had this happen to my pro-lite 4 lrg last night after I believe 11 years of faithfull service (i think i bought it together with my msr mo-room tent), so i had no qualms about ordering a thermarest luxury map to replace it. I’ll see if it still falls under warranty after my vacation, since the smaller pro-lite is nice and compact when I’m not taking the car

    Like

    • Hi Vincent, after 11 years of faithful service I think you have had your money’s worth, well done. No need to screw another mat out of them. It is not as though it failed unreasonably for you. They do make good gear, however I am hearing qualms re their uber mat which seems to have come in a bit to thin

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: